Photo of Priya Taneja

Priya Taneja

Subscribe to Priya Taneja's Posts

Read time – 2 minutes 30 seconds

Social finance, impact investing, blended finance…the endless industry jargon and terminology in this emerging asset class can be confusing. In this series, our industry leading global Social Impact Finance group looks to demystify the social finance market and its growing importance for financial institutions and investors.  

Greed is no longer good. The next generation of investors increasingly demand that their investments do more than just generate a financial return. Demand for social investment products is driven, in part, by millennials who prefer to invest in alignment with personal values. In response to this growing demand, chatter in financial markets is awash with talk of the ‘spectrum of capital’ – a map of the broad range of risk and return strategies that exist within impact investing markets, and how those relate to wider capital market strategies. The 2014 report from the G8 Social Impact Investment Taskforce, Asset Allocation Working Group, illustrated the landscape based on both investor financial objectives and impact (see diagram below).
Continue Reading Impact Finance Series: The Spectrum of Capital

Time for a spring clean?

Institutions holding non-performing loans (“NPLs”) have been and continue to be, under increasing pressure to divest these and “clean up” their balance sheets in order to free up capital, de-risk and preserve market reputation. Usually, a loan facility becomes non-performing when either payments of principal and interest are past due by 90 days or more, or where payments are less than 90 days overdue, it is expected that payments will not be made in full. Alternatively, other loans can also be regarded as non-performing if they are value impaired (e.g. if the borrower has breached key covenants in its facility or if repayment terms have been altered).

Where a borrower is in financial trouble, it may first look to a lender for restructuring options such as extending its facility, foregoing interest payments or deferring repayments. From a bank’s point of view, holding on to NPLs causes a real issue since they increase a bank’s management costs, with frequent analysis required to monitor the financial position of the borrower and its underlying assets. There are also broader repercussions to consider given that NPLs may tend to limit a bank’s ability to lend. It also potentially drives up interest rate margins thereby creating uncertainty. Divesting NPL portfolios at a discount benefits banks who recoup some value, gain liquidity and distance themselves from the risk factors associated with holding onto distressed assets, such as a potential downgrades in its credit rating or a greater chance of bank insolvency.

Why take on a bad apple?Continue Reading NPLs – Car Boot Sale!